The Division isn't a bad game in any way, it just screwed across the PvE side quite little to be honest, they have many other games that offer more PvE content despite the fact that they have exactly the exact same repetitive gameplay. Ghost Recon Wildlands have weapon components throughout the map, skill points and so on, even though that is pretty pointless as well, it is going to alter your character to make the game easier or more fun. They also have tons of rebel missions to boost your capability to use rebel abilities, so the game may , be more fun or easier.

Take Red Dead Redemption 2 for instance, that is a game that adds arbitrary experiences, side missions and the main narrative, and a ton of different collectibles. Never once did it feel unworthy performing these side activities out of the story, because it had something to do with how the sport is playedwith. With The Department, these side tasks does nothing except to give you points to upgrade the foundation. It wont change the outcome of the game, it will create your character more liked or not and you're able to finish the entire game without performing the side actions. But in Red Dead Redemption 2, each little thing you do will influence the rest of the match, sort of. Feels way more rewarding, sure it is a very different game, but both are still available world action-adventure.

I'm well aware how you create the game up as you play and I've done this, in each one of the Assassin's Creed matches, Ghost Recon Wildlands etc. All I stated was that The Section did not hit the spot for me personally, it was not a terrible game but it could've been better. Yes, your mind is intially what makes a match fun.The original Assassin's Creed match was quite empty in contrast to the later ones, together with Rogue being the best at the franchise for me. It's quite natural that the first game in a franchise wont reach orgasm for every single player it's. The Section was still fun but it didn't match towards Ghost Recon Wildlands for instance.

By the looks of it The Division 2 will change this up a bit and I believe that it will be a better name, for me.Edit: Also to quote one,"if any game you play is repetitive it is 100 percent your fault" that is incorrect. Even developers has consented that their formula in matches is repetitive, that's a fact. Yes, I can creatively make it less or not repetitive at all. But it comes down to having a repetitive formula in them, it's simply copy and paste to fill a game universe. Also a fact.

Would be a sick thought if they left the endgame a sizable live battle against the enemy and also the results of the game is determined depending on how much camps/strongholds the players defend/capture. If the players don't win the war everyone'loses' The Division 2 also it can not be reversed. If you make something like this and make it quite large scaled thousands of player would have to work with each other to win the match. Otherwise The Division 2 will proceed in history since the match the players lost.

More The Division 2 products in https://www.mmotank.com/The-division-2-Boosting.html